Santa Barbara · November 3, 2026

Your ballot,
in plain English.

A thick envelope. A long list of names. Decisions that deserve more than a slogan.

Generated for City of Santa Barbara District 4 voters. Other voters may find the statewide and shared races helpful. Your address determines your exact ballot.

AI-generated independent guide by Brian Galura / Zero Conjecture.
Sources checked October 11, 2026. No endorsements or vote recommendations.

Ballots began mailingOctober 5

Check your registration and ballot status.

Registration deadlineOctober 19

Conditional registration remains available after this date.

Election DayNovember 3

Polls open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Official dates ↗

Before you begin

One address.
Several different districts.

City Council District 4 is not County Supervisor District 4 or an SBCC trustee area. This guide covers selected local races, shared state and federal contests, and statewide propositions. Compare it with your official sample ballot for every address-specific office and local measure.

01 / Close to home

Who will make
the city’s decisions?

The mayor is elected citywide. District 4 voters also elect their Council representative. Both roles vote on city policy and budgets; the mayor is not a separate executive who can implement a platform alone.

City election information and candidate list ↗

City Council · District 4

Four candidates. The same topics. Names shown alphabetically by surname.

Positions summarized from campaign platforms and reporting. Backgrounds below separate public service, work history and what the sources establish. The privacy tab identifies both reported statements and unanswered questions from the reviewed platforms and October 8 forum report. Missing detail does not establish support or opposition. A proposal is not a guarantee of results. How to check a background claim ↗

Council District 4 · Nonpartisan office

Jason Dominguez

Former City Council member; attorney and law professor.

Background & experience
Public service

Represented Council District 1 from 2016 to 2019, according to Noozhawk. His campaign also lists service as a tribal judge for the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians.

Work history & local ties

Reported roles include prosecutor, legal-aid attorney, international-tribunal legal officer and law professor. His biography names California Rural Legal Assistance, the Legal Aid Foundation, and the Santa Barbara and Ventura Colleges of Law.

What the sources establish

The campaign lists selected roles and accomplishments. Those claims are not a complete employment timeline or an audit of his Council voting record.

Reported history · Noozhawk, October 6 (updated October 8)

State Street

Favors testing one-way vehicle access from De la Guerra Street to the Arlington Theatre while keeping lower blocks pedestrian-focused.

Council District 4 · Nonpartisan office

Genevieve Taft-Vazquez

Neighborhood Advisory Council member; sustainability and ethical-sourcing professional.

Background & experience
Public service

Serves on the Neighborhood Advisory Council, according to Noozhawk.

Work history & local ties

Her campaign describes more than 15 years at Coca-Cola in human rights and sustainable sourcing, plus work at Gap Inc., the Fair Labor Association and AHA Bolivia. Noozhawk also reports her Coca-Cola work.

What the sources establish

The campaign’s career page names these organizations but does not provide a dated timeline for every role. Its description of corporate social impact is her account, not an independently measured result.

Reported history · Noozhawk, October 6 (updated October 8)

State Street

Wants the adopted plan to move forward, with a walkable downtown and cultural activity.

Council District 4 · Nonpartisan office

Devon Wardlow

Planning Commissioner; public-policy professional.

Background & experience
Public service

Planning Commissioner since 2021; her campaign says she became chair in 2025 and previously served on the County Historic Landmarks Advisory Commission.

Work history & local ties

Noozhawk identifies her current role as head of public policy at Obvio, an AI traffic-enforcement company. A company biography in a December 2020 Fresno application lists Facebook small-business policy manager (2015–2016), Lyft federal-affairs manager (2016–2018), Coastal Dispensary public-affairs director (2018–2020) and Embarc public-affairs vice president starting in 2020.

What the sources establish

The 2020 application is an employer-supplied historical account, not independent verification of every job date or a statement that Embarc is her current employer. It describes federal legislative work at Lyft. This update does not establish the dates or scope of formal lobbying registrations. Her employment does not establish her position on city ALPR rules.

Reported history · Noozhawk, October 6 (updated October 8)

State Street

Describes the adopted plan as housing and stormwater infrastructure as well as public space.

Council District 4 · Nonpartisan office

Monte Wilson

Business executive with experience at Adobe and Oracle.

Background & experience
Public service

Co-founded Santa Barbara Cars & Coffee, according to Noozhawk. His campaign also describes charity work including Rally4Kids.

Work history & local ties

Reported executive roles include Adobe and Oracle, with retirement in 2022. His campaign describes his family’s involvement in The Painted Cabernet on State Street.

What the sources establish

His campaign names Adobe and Oracle but gives no full list of titles or dated employment history. His family’s downtown business connection is context, not proof of a conflict of interest.

Reported history · Noozhawk, October 6 (updated October 8)

State Street

Favors a hybrid approach, keeping lower blocks pedestrian-focused and reopening upper blocks to vehicles.

An issue, not a shortcut

“Open State Street” leaves a lot unsaid.

Ask which blocks, when vehicles would have access, how construction gets funded, and what happens to stormwater and housing. The adopted plan and a candidate’s preferred operating rules are different things.

Explore the State Street plan ↗

Mayor · Citywide

Four qualified candidates. General policies come from the September 28 comparison; surveillance statements come from reporting on the September 30 forum.

Mayor · Nonpartisan office

Eric Friedman

District 5 Council member and Finance Committee chair.

Background & experience

First elected to District 5 in 2017 and re-elected in 2021. Chairs the Council Finance Committee. Earlier city service includes the Harbor Commission and Library Committee. The October 1 forum report identifies earlier work for then-County Supervisor Salud Carbajal and current work at Trader Joe’s.

Official city biography

Supports reopening upper State Street blocks during construction, restoring reserves and adding affordable housing. Opposes the rent-stabilization approach discussed in the September interview.

Privacy & surveillance

Opposed Flock cameras at the September 30 forum. Said police should have useful tools while protecting civil liberties. This is not a stated rejection of every ALPR system; the report does not specify his search, retention or sharing rules.

Forum reported October 1, 2026.

Mayor · Nonpartisan office

Matt Kilrain

Also known as “Boat Rat Matt”; qualified for the mayoral ballot.

Background & experience

Previously ran for mayor in 2021. His campaign site describes his earlier candidacy but does not provide a detailed employment history in the text reviewed for this update.

Campaign account · employment history not established here

The cited comparison article did not receive an interview response. This guide does not infer policy positions from that absence.

Privacy & surveillance

The September 30 forum report covers the other three candidates and confirms Kilrain is also on the ballot. A specific ALPR policy was not established in the reviewed sources. Ask him the same search, retention, sharing and audit questions.

Forum reported October 1, 2026.

Mayor · Nonpartisan office

Wendy Sims-Moten

Former school-board president; First 5 Santa Barbara County executive director.

Background & experience

Served on the Santa Barbara Unified School Board from 2016 through 2024. Leads First 5 Santa Barbara County and has worked for the county for more than 30 years.

Reported history · Noozhawk, September 28

Emphasizes inclusive budget meetings and moving State Street beyond the cars debate. Supports rent stabilization with a sunset and review.

Privacy & surveillance

Opposed Flock cameras at the September 30 forum. Called for community input before proceeding, particularly from people burdened or frightened by surveillance. The report does not specify her search, retention or sharing rules.

Forum reported October 1, 2026.

Mayor · Nonpartisan office

Kristen Sneddon

District 4 Council member; environmental-geology educator.

Background & experience

First elected to District 4 in 2017 and re-elected in 2021. Teaches environmental geology at SBCC and previously served on Peabody Charter School’s governing board.

Reported history · Noozhawk, September 28

Supports phased State Street construction, rebuilding reserves and rent stabilization. Proposes a trolley and parking validation for downtown access.

Privacy & surveillance

Opposed Flock cameras at the September 30 forum. Warned about AI, data collection and surveillance risks to the community. The report does not provide a complete alternative camera policy.

Forum reported October 1, 2026.

What about the SBCC trustee race?

SBCC has seven elected trustees with separate trustee-area boundaries. Area 3’s current term runs through 2028; the November contest reported for Mission Canyon and parts of Santa Barbara is Area 5, between E. Howard Green and Dominique Luján. It is not automatically every City District 4 voter’s contest.

E. Howard Green

Background & experience

Worked for IBM for 30 years. Reported community service includes transportation and senior-citizen committees, Medicare counseling and tax-preparation volunteering. Has taken SBCC courses for 15 years.

Reported history · News-Press, October 6

Dominique Luján

Background & experience

Worked at Lionsgate as an event planner and location scout. Returned to college, earned an SBCC addictive-disorders counseling certificate and associate’s degree, and is studying toward transfer to UCSB.

Reported history · News-Press, October 6

Green emphasizes his learning and professional experience. Luján emphasizes his experience as a current student. Check your official sample ballot before treating this race as yours.

Reader feedback / Privacy & accountability

License plate cameras.
Who controls the data?

Automated license plate readers (ALPRs) record vehicle plates and sightings. Readers asked about privacy, police access and safeguards. The city’s camera contract is a local decision. Privacy, surveillance and government accountability also matter in state, federal and education races. Compare each candidate’s answer with the powers of the office.

What the city has decided

After the Flock contract ended, staff proposed City-controlled Verkada cameras. On September 15, Council voted 5–2 to pause that agreement until it reviews the city and police ALPR policies. The proposal described in the city recap would not permit multi-agency searching or facial recognition. Those are proposed features, not proof of an operating replacement system.

Official September 15 recap ↗

Questions a useful policy should answer

  • Who may search, for which purposes, and under what approval?
  • How long are sightings retained, and how is deletion checked?
  • Can data leave the city system, and who approves sharing?
  • Are searches logged, audited and publicly reported?
  • What happens when someone misuses access?
Police policy documents ↗

What we can say about candidates

The mayoral cards now include dated statements about Flock from the September 30 forum. Opposition to that vendor does not establish opposition to every camera system. District 4 summaries distinguish general privacy or immigration-enforcement statements from unanswered ALPR questions. An employer or a vote to review a policy is not a complete position on surveillance safeguards.

Reports of abuse elsewhere identify risks to investigate. They do not establish misconduct by Santa Barbara police. City police and the County Sheriff are separate agencies; the city's contract decision does not settle county policy.

The same question. Different authority.

Suggested questions for candidates, not summaries of their positions.

Mayor & City Council

Would you support this camera contract? Which search, retention, sharing and audit rules would you require for city police, and how would residents check compliance?

City election and office information ↗

Governor, Assembly & attorney general

Which statewide privacy protections would you strengthen, fund or enforce? The Legislature writes laws, the governor signs or vetoes them, and the attorney general has enforcement responsibilities. Ask for specific bills, actions and limits.

California DOJ has published ALPR usage and data-sharing guidance. It is statewide context, not proof that a particular local system complies.

State ALPR guidance and model policies ↗

Congress

What limits and oversight would you support for federal access to location data, surveillance spending and federal data use? Ask for a proposed law or recorded vote. A representative does not choose the city’s camera vendor.

What the House does ↗

Education, insurance & other offices

How would you protect sensitive records and oversee vendors within this office’s authority? For education, ask about student records and campus technology. For insurance, ask about consumer data. Financial and election offices have their own records and oversight duties.

Official descriptions of statewide offices ↗

A background feature for every candidate.

Open “Background & experience” beside any candidate or justice in this guide. Each summary identifies its source: official biography, reporting or a campaign’s own account. A campaign biography is a claim to check, not independent verification.

Compare relevant work and public service with dated records, recorded votes and disclosures. Employment alone does not establish a policy position or misconduct. Background summaries are selected histories, not complete employment, lobbying, financial-disclosure or voting-record audits. When reviewed sources lack detail, the guide says so.

Judges are different: review judicial experience and decisions, rather than asking them to promise outcomes in future cases. Claims about concealed work or integrity need specific evidence and a candidate response before inclusion.

02 / Beyond City Hall

Start with the job.
Then compare the candidates.

Party labels identify affiliation, not a recommendation. Candidate statements describe what campaigns say they will do and are not independently verified by the Secretary of State.

U.S. House · District 24

Federal laws and spending.

Salud Carbajal (Democratic), Member of Congress.
Bob Smith (Republican), Defense Systems Engineer.

Carbajal’s campaign emphasizes health-care affordability, environmental protection and reproductive rights. Smith’s emphasizes lower living costs, vocational education and border enforcement.

Salud Carbajal

Background & experience

First elected to Congress in 2016. Previously served 12 years on the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors and eight years in the Marine Corps Reserve.

Official congressional biography

Bob Smith

Background & experience

His campaign describes more than 26 years in the Navy, reaching commander, with assignments on advanced weapons systems. The certified ballot lists his occupation as defense systems engineer.

Campaign biography · self-reported service and work

State Assembly · District 37

State laws and spending.

Gregg Hart (Democratic), State Assemblymember.
Sari Domingues (Republican), Retired Business Analyst.

Hart’s published priorities include housing supply, climate protection and access to education. Domingues emphasizes parental rights, reading and math, law enforcement and fiscal responsibility.

Gregg Hart

Background & experience

Sworn into the Assembly in December 2022. Earlier served as county supervisor, Santa Barbara councilmember, California coastal commissioner, a transportation-program leader and legislative assistant to Jack O’Connell.

Official Assembly appointment biography

Sari Domingues

Background & experience

The certified candidate list identifies her as a retired business analyst. Her campaign biography describes her Santa Maria upbringing but does not provide a detailed employer or dated work history in the text reviewed here.

Campaign biography · certified occupation separately linked

Governor

Leads the executive branch, proposes the state budget and signs or vetoes legislation.

Both entries in the official guide have no candidate statement. Statements are voluntary and paid for. The summaries here use campaign material and an interview, not statements supplied to the guide.

Democratic

Xavier Becerra

Background & experience

Former U.S. Health and Human Services secretary (2021–2025), California attorney general (2017–2021) and member of Congress (1993–2017). Earlier work included private legal practice and the state Assembly.

Official congressional history

His campaign emphasizes health care, housing affordability, disaster preparedness and protecting rights.

Position source ↗

Republican

Steve Hilton

Background & experience

Former adviser to British Prime Minister David Cameron and former Fox News host. AP reported that he had not held elected office when he launched his general-election campaign.

Reported history · Associated Press, July 22

Proposes lower income taxes, cheaper fuel and limits on government costs for new housing.

Position source ↗
Official office description and statements ↗
Lieutenant Governor

Serves on higher-education boards and acts as governor when needed.

Republican

Gloria Romero

Background & experience

Former California senator and Senate majority leader. Pepperdine’s faculty biography also describes her work as founder/executive director of Scholarship Prep Charter School and in parent-empowerment advocacy.

University faculty biography

Emphasizes education standards, school choice and economic opportunity.

Candidate statement ↗
Official office description and statements ↗
Secretary of State

Oversees statewide election administration and business filings.

Democratic

Shirley N. Weber

Background & experience

Secretary of state since 2021. Previously served four Assembly terms and taught at San Diego State University, helping found its Africana Studies department.

Official appointment biography

Emphasizes voting access and protecting voting rights.

Candidate statement ↗

Republican

Don Wagner

Background & experience

His campaign biography lists service in the Assembly from 2010 to 2016, as Irvine mayor and as an Orange County supervisor. It describes earlier business and real-estate legal practice.

Campaign biography · self-reported history

Calls for faster counts and voter identification.

Candidate statement ↗
Official office description and statements ↗
Controller

Audits public spending and oversees state accounting and payments.

Democratic

Malia Cohen

Background & experience

Elected controller in 2022 after service on the Board of Equalization. Previously served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and its budget and finance committee.

Official controller biography

Emphasizes payroll modernization, public financial reports and unclaimed-property access.

Candidate statement ↗

Republican

Herb W. Morgan

Background & experience

His campaign says he founded Efficient Market Advisors, worked as an investment chief and served on the San Diego City Employees’ Retirement System board. Cantor’s 2017 acquisition announcement corroborates the founder and investment-chief roles.

Campaign biography · employer corroboration linked

Proposes more detailed public spending reports and audits.

Candidate statement ↗
Official office description and statements ↗
Treasurer

Manages state borrowing, investments and financing programs.

Democratic

Eleni Kounalakis

Background & experience

Lieutenant governor since 2019 and U.S. ambassador to Hungary from 2010 to 2013. Earlier worked for 18 years at housing developer AKT Development, including as president.

Official lieutenant-governor biography

Emphasizes housing finance, pensions and children’s savings.

Candidate statement ↗

Republican

Jennifer Hawks

Background & experience

Her campaign describes her as a retired business executive with budget and operations experience. The reviewed biography does not name employers or provide a dated employment timeline.

Campaign biography · employer detail not established here

Emphasizes financial oversight and private-sector budget experience.

Candidate statement ↗
Official office description and statements ↗
Attorney General

Leads the state justice department and represents California in legal matters.

Rob Bonta supplied no statement for the official guide. His summary uses his campaign platform.

Democratic

Rob Bonta

Background & experience

Attorney general since April 2021. Previously served more than eight years in the Assembly, worked as a San Francisco deputy city attorney and practiced law privately.

Official attorney-general biography

Emphasizes consumer protection, civil rights and public safety.

Campaign platform ↗

Republican

Michael E. Gates

Background & experience

His candidate statement describes work as a trial attorney and prosecutor, Huntington Beach city attorney, and in civil-rights enforcement at the U.S. Department of Justice. Claims about crime reductions are not verified by this history summary.

Candidate-supplied statement · not checked by the Secretary of State

Emphasizes prosecution, enforcement of Proposition 36 and trafficking cases.

Candidate statement ↗
Official office description and statements ↗
Insurance Commissioner

Regulates insurance companies and consumer protections.

Democratic

Ben Allen

Background & experience

State senator and attorney. Previously served as president of the Santa Monica-Malibu school board, lectured at UCLA Law School and worked at Bryan Cave, Richardson & Patel and the nonprofit Spark Program.

Official Senate biography

Proposes stronger competition and consumer protections within the private insurance market.

Candidate statement ↗

Democratic

Jane Kim

Background & experience

Her campaign describes work as a civil-rights attorney, San Francisco supervisor, and California director for Bernie Sanders and the Working Families Party. These are campaign-described roles, not an audit of her full employment history.

Campaign biography · self-reported history

Proposes a public disaster-insurance program, limits on excessive profits and stronger claims enforcement.

Candidate statement ↗
Official office description and statements ↗
Board of Equalization, District 2

Oversees property-tax assessment practices and certain specialized taxes.

Democratic

Sally J. Lieber

Background & experience

Elected to the Board of Equalization in 2022. Earlier served in the Assembly and on the Mountain View City Council, including as mayor, with additional regional transportation and water roles.

Official Board of Equalization biography

Emphasizes equitable assessments, taxpayer assistance and disaster recovery.

Candidate statement ↗

Democratic

John Pimentel

Background & experience

A community-college trustee elected in 2020. His district biography lists renewable-energy businesses, work at Bain & Company and service as California deputy secretary for transportation in the 1990s.

Official district biography · historical document

Emphasizes reform, transparent assessments and scrutiny of utility tax treatment.

Candidate statement ↗
Official office description and statements ↗
Superintendent of Public Instruction

An elected education leader who advocates for public schools and serves on education boards.

Nonpartisan office

Richard Barrera

Background & experience

His official-guide statement describes 18 years on the San Diego Unified School Board, including service as president. Its claims about student achievement remain campaign claims in this guide.

Candidate-supplied statement · not checked by the Secretary of State

Emphasizes classroom investment, student protection and extending reforms from San Diego Unified.

Candidate statement ↗

Nonpartisan office

Sonja Shaw

Background & experience

Elected to the Chino Valley school board in 2022 and served as board president. The district biography lists earlier fitness/health and photography businesses and a former California real-estate license.

Official school-district biography

Emphasizes academic standards, fiscal transparency and policies concerning girls’ sports and facilities.

Candidate statement ↗
Official office description and statements ↗

03 / Fourteen separate decisions

What changes
if this passes?

Read the legal effect first. Then the cost and the tradeoff. Campaign arguments are identified as arguments, not facts. Fiscal figures come from the official guide’s nonpartisan analysis. The numbering jumps from 5 to 37; the official guide lists these 14 measures, not a missing set of 31.

14 propositions

Read these together · 40 / 41 / 42

One proposed tax. Two proposed limits.

Prop. 40 creates a one-time wealth tax. Prop. 41 adds audit and spending-limit rules. Prop. 42 restricts new personal-property and retroactive taxes. The official analysis says Prop. 40 could be prevented from taking effect if Prop. 41 or 42 receives more yes votes and a court finds the measures conflict. Passing Prop. 40 by a majority would not necessarily settle that question.

Read the official Prop. 40 analysis ↗
1HousingAffordable housing bonds
A yes vote

Borrow $11.25 billion for affordable housing, veterans’ mortgages and homebuyer assistance.

A no vote

Do not authorize these housing bonds.

Money and implementation
Estimated state repayment: $500 million to $600 million each year for about 25 years.
The argument to weigh
Supporters emphasize housing access. No opposition argument was submitted; borrowing still has a repayment cost.
2BudgetA larger rainy-day reserve
A yes vote

Change reserve and extra debt-payment rules to build larger state budget reserves.

A no vote

Keep existing reserve and debt-payment rules.

Money and implementation
Higher state reserves; additional debt payments would continue for longer.
The argument to weigh
Supporters emphasize protection during downturns. Opponents say excluding deposits from the spending limit could reduce taxpayer rebates.
3TaxesMake the high-income tax permanent
A yes vote

Make permanent the existing higher tax rates on income above about $371,000, adjusted annually, instead of letting them expire in 2031.

A no vote

Let that temporary increase expire in 2031.

Money and implementation
Preserves an estimated $5 billion to $15 billion in annual income-tax revenue after 2031.
The argument to weigh
Supporters emphasize school funding. Opponents object to making a temporary tax permanent.
4ElectionsAllow public campaign funding
A yes vote

Allow governments to establish public campaign-finance programs with restrictions on eligible funds and recipients.

A no vote

Keep the ban for the state and most local governments.

Money and implementation
A few hundred thousand dollars in annual state administration costs, apart from any future financing programs.
The argument to weigh
Supporters want less dependence on private donors. Opponents object to taxpayer funding of campaigns. Approval permits programs; it does not automatically create one.
5ElectionsChange the recall process
A yes vote

Separate the removal decision from the replacement process, with a later election or appointment as applicable.

A no vote

Keep the current recall and replacement rules.

Money and implementation
Net costs depend on the number and timing of recalls and replacement elections.
The argument to weigh
Supporters favor a separate replacement decision. Opponents favor deciding removal and replacement in one election.
37HousingHomebuyer assistance loans
A yes vote

Create a program financed with up to $25 billion in revenue bonds repaid through homeowners’ loan payments.

A no vote

Do not require this new homebuyer program.

Money and implementation
The official estimate identifies no direct state or local cost. Homeowners repay the revenue bonds through their loans.
The argument to weigh
Supporters emphasize access to homeownership. No opposition argument was submitted. Eligible borrowers need income qualification, owner occupancy and at least 3% down; assistance covers up to 17% of a qualifying new home’s price.
38HealthMedical research bonds
A yes vote

Authorize $8.4 billion in borrowing for immunology and immunotherapy research.

A no vote

Do not authorize these research bonds.

Money and implementation
Estimated repayment: $500 million to $600 million annually for about 20 years, potentially offset by research revenue.
The argument to weigh
Supporters emphasize potential treatments. Opponents object to long-term debt and favor funding through the budget. Research revenue is uncertain; it is not guaranteed to cover repayment.
39ElectionsNew voter identification requirements
A yes vote

Require government ID for in-person voting and designated ID digits on mailed ballot envelopes.

A no vote

Keep the current signature-based identity process.

Money and implementation
Estimated annual implementation costs range from tens of millions to the low hundreds of millions of dollars.
The argument to weigh
Supporters emphasize confidence in elections. Opponents cite access barriers, privacy and cost. These proposed requirements are not instructions for completing your current ballot.
40TaxesA one-time billionaire wealth tax
A yes vote

Collect a one-time tax equal to 5% of qualifying billionaires’ wealth.

A no vote

Do not impose this one-time wealth tax.

Money and implementation
Temporary revenue in the tens of billions over several years; possible continuing income-tax losses below $1 billion a year.
The argument to weigh
Supporters emphasize health-care revenue. Opponents cite economic and budget risks. Read together with Props. 41 and 42.
41TaxesTax audits and the spending limit
A yes vote

Require reviews of programs financed by new special taxes and restrict exclusions from the state spending limit.

A no vote

Keep existing audit responsibilities and spending-limit rules.

Money and implementation
Net fiscal effects are unknown and depend on later policy decisions.
The argument to weigh
Supporters emphasize accountability. Opponents say it could undo the billionaire tax. It also reaches qualifying taxes enacted after January 1, 2026.
42TaxesRestrict future wealth taxes
A yes vote

Prohibit new state taxes on ownership of personal property and retroactive taxes, including conflicting taxes enacted after January 1, 2026.

A no vote

Keep the state’s option to establish those taxes.

Money and implementation
Future tax-revenue growth could be lower.
The argument to weigh
Supporters emphasize protection of assets. Opponents say the purpose is to block the billionaire tax. Personal property here includes financial assets, not real estate.
43TaxesTwo-thirds for certain local taxes
A yes vote

Require two-thirds approval for voter-initiated local special taxes starting January 1, 2027.

A no vote

Keep majority approval for those taxes.

Money and implementation
Future local tax-revenue growth could be lower.
The argument to weigh
Supporters favor a higher threshold for taxes. Opponents say it makes essential local-service funding harder. It concerns specific-purpose taxes, not every local tax.
44HealthA spending rule for nonprofit clinics
A yes vote

Require covered nonprofit community clinics to devote at least 90% of revenue to program services advancing their charitable purpose.

A no vote

Do not introduce this spending requirement.

Money and implementation
State administration costs in the low tens of millions each year, financed by fees.
The argument to weigh
Supporters emphasize accountability and patient services. Opponents warn of clinic closures and reduced access. The requirement applies to specified clinics, not all nonprofits.
45EnvironmentFaster environmental review
A yes vote

Introduce tighter review deadlines and narrower court-review procedures for eligible projects.

A no vote

Keep current environmental-review and court-challenge procedures.

Money and implementation
Initial yearly government costs in the high tens of millions, potentially above $100 million; some fee funding. Longer-term effects are uncertain.
The argument to weigh
Supporters emphasize faster construction and lower costs. Opponents warn of weaker environmental and community review.

“Reviewed” marks reading progress only. It does not record a vote choice. Progress lasts for this page session and is not sent anywhere.

04 / Judicial retention

Keep this justice
in this role?

This is a yes-or-no retention question, not a contest between two candidates. Yes retains the named justice. No is a vote against retention. A judicial title or party preference is not a substitute for reviewing a judge’s work.

Court of Appeal · District 2

Eighteen names.

Santa Barbara County is in the Second Appellate District. Its justices appear in several divisions.

Official biographies ↗
See all 20 justices, their courts and backgrounds
Kelli M. EvansSupreme Court
Background & experience

Supreme Court justice since 2023; previously an Alameda County judge, governor’s legal adviser, California DOJ attorney and civil-rights lawyer.

Official judicial biography

Joshua P. GrobanSupreme Court
Background & experience

Supreme Court justice since 2018; earlier adviser to Governor Jerry Brown, private-practice attorney and UCLA law lecturer.

Official judicial biography

Michelle C. KimCourt of Appeal · Division 1
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2024; previously a Los Angeles Superior Court judge and county public defender and alternate public defender.

Official judicial biography

Gregory J. WeingartCourt of Appeal · Division 1
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2022; previously a Los Angeles Superior Court judge, federal prosecutor and partner at Munger Tolles & Olson.

Official judicial biography

Steve GoorvitchCourt of Appeal · Division 2
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2026; previously a Los Angeles Superior Court judge, federal prosecutor, SEC enforcement attorney and lawyer at O’Melveny & Myers.

Official judicial biography

Anne RichardsonCourt of Appeal · Division 2
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2024; previously a Los Angeles Superior Court judge, private civil litigator and director of consumer litigation at Public Counsel.

Official judicial biography

Rashida A. AdamsCourt of Appeal · Division 3
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2023 and presiding justice since 2026; previously a Los Angeles Superior Court judge, appellate research attorney and employment/civil litigator.

Official judicial biography

Mark HanasonoCourt of Appeal · Division 3
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2025; previously a Los Angeles Superior Court judge and county public defender and alternate public defender.

Official judicial biography

Helen ZukinCourt of Appeal · Division 4
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2023 and presiding justice since 2025; previously a Los Angeles Superior Court judge and plaintiffs’ civil litigator at several firms.

Official judicial biography

Audra M. MoriCourt of Appeal · Division 4
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2023; previously a Los Angeles Superior Court judge and intellectual-property and commercial litigator at Perkins Coie.

Official judicial biography

Nicholas DaumCourt of Appeal · Division 4
Background & experience

Appellate justice since August 2026; previously a Los Angeles Superior Court judge and private litigator at Susman Godfrey and Kendall Brill and Kelly.

Official judicial biography

Armen TamzarianCourt of Appeal · Division 4
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2025; previously a Los Angeles Superior Court judge, appellate court attorney and private business, employment and real-estate litigator.

Official judicial biography

Brian M. HoffstadtCourt of Appeal · Division 5
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2014 and Division Five presiding justice since 2024; previously a Los Angeles Superior Court judge, federal prosecutor and Jones Day partner.

Official judicial biography

Tari L. CodyCourt of Appeal · Division 6
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2023 and presiding justice since 2026; previously served 22 years as a Ventura County Superior Court judge, following private legal practice.

Official judicial biography

Kenneth R. YeganCourt of Appeal · Division 6
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 1990; earlier Ventura County public defender, appellate judicial attorney, private lawyer and municipal and superior court judge.

Official judicial biography

Gonzalo C. MartinezCourt of Appeal · Division 7
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2023 and presiding justice since 2024; earlier governor’s office adviser, California deputy solicitor general and private appellate lawyer.

Official judicial biography

Natalie StoneCourt of Appeal · Division 7
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2024; earlier Los Angeles Superior Court judge, appellate court attorney and civil litigator at Munger Tolles & Olson.

Official judicial biography

John WileyCourt of Appeal · Division 8
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2018 and Superior Court judge from 2002; earlier federal prosecutor and tenured UCLA law professor.

Official judicial biography

Matthew A. ScherbCourt of Appeal · Division 8
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2025; earlier Supreme Court chambers attorney, Los Angeles city attorney, appellate court attorney and private intellectual-property litigator.

Official judicial biography

Victor G. ViramontesCourt of Appeal · Division 8
Background & experience

Appellate justice since 2022; earlier Los Angeles Superior Court judge, MALDEF lawyer and U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission trial attorney.

Official judicial biography

Certified judicial retention list ↗

05 / What people are asking now

The latest signal.
With the source attached.

The initial research was followed by five focused last30days searches on local candidates, work history, campaign funding and surveillance. The follow-up ran October 11 (Pacific); its UTC date window was September 12 through October 12. Supplemental reporting and official records were checked separately. These selected threads and reports help identify questions to explain. They are not polling, a representative sample or evidence of who will win.

October 1, 2026 · Reported mayoral forum

Opposing Flock is only part of an answer

Friedman, Sims-Moten and Sneddon opposed Flock at the September 30 forum. Their comments differ on police tools, community input and AI risks. Read the mayoral cards, then ask each candidate for specific search, retention, sharing and audit rules.

Read the source ↗

October 11, 2026 · Reader feedback checked

What is behind the campaign biography?

Council backgrounds now show named employers and source limits. Wardlow’s historical employer-supplied application provides more specific Facebook, Lyft and cannabis-company roles. A job title alone does not establish a policy position or misconduct.

Read the source ↗

October 10, 2026 · Local discussion

“How do I compare four candidates?”

A District 4 thread focuses on overlapping positions and vote splitting. Some participants discuss party endorsements. Start by comparing proposals and experience; this thread cannot establish who will win.

Read the source ↗

October 10, 2026 · Local discussion

“What do all these judge names mean?”

Residents ask how to evaluate retention votes. Replies include endorsement opinions. The judicial section explains the vote and links to official biographies without assigning a default yes or no.

Read the source ↗

October 8, 2026 · Reported candidate forum

State Street, spending and homelessness

New forum coverage adds candidate responses about the adopted plan, city costs, immigration enforcement and homelessness. These are reported positions, not verified outcomes of future policies.

Read the source ↗

October 10, 2026 · Statewide discussion

“Why are the governor statements blank?”

Both governor entries in the official guide say no candidate statement. Statements are voluntary and paid for; absence does not mean a candidate is missing from the ballot. Their position sources are linked in the governor section.

Read the source ↗

Campaign participants may be present in comment threads. Unrelated prediction markets, older videos and unsupported accusations were excluded. Recent discussion is kept separate from official ballot facts.

06 / How this was made

AI makes the guide.
The sources make it checkable.

This is an independent educational project, generated with AI to turn a long election brief and recent research into something easier to navigate. It is not an official election publication. The ballot and the original source documents remain the reference.

A source behind each summary.

Official candidate lists establish who is running. Official analyses explain measures and fiscal effects. Campaign statements establish stated positions. Reporting adds interviews; social discussion supplies questions.

Every candidate is presented without a ranking. The guide explains choices and tradeoffs, and leaves the decision to you.

A snapshot, not a live feed.

Checked October 11, 2026. Campaign positions and election information can change. Reading progress stays in this page session. You do not need to provide your address or voting choices to use the guide.

Found a correction? Send the source and the section ↗